Request a callback today »

A Guide to Restrictive Covenants

January 13, 2020 | By: Victoria Owings

restrictive covenantsHere at Wirehouse we get many questions regarding restrictive covenants and the desire for employers to restrict what an employee can do once their employment has been terminated. The starting point for employers is to understand that any contractual term which restricts a former employees activities would be unlawful as a restraint of trade and therefore the clause would be void and worthless. As with most areas of Employment Law however, there are caveats to this position. It will not be void if;
  • The restriction protects a legitimate business interest such as confidential client contract information, details of suppliers, the stability of the workforce etc. and crucially,
  • it is reasonable in its restrictions and is specific to the interests listed above.
Too often have we seen wide, woolly and vague clauses basically stating that a former employee cannot work in the industry, anywhere in the UK, for at least 12 months, nor speak to clients, staff or suppliers within that industry also. This is a prime example of an unlawful clause which would not be enforceable and is not worth the paper it is written on. A business should really spend time considering what they actually want to stop happening in the future. The more draconian and restrictive the clause, the more you need to be able to justify it.

Aspects to Consider when Putting Restrictive Covenants in Place

  • The duration of the restriction. As a rule of thumb, anything over 6 months is often likely to be too onerous and therefore unenforceable. If an employee has a strong relationship with a client, can someone else create a relationship with that client for the business within 3 – 6 months in order to protect the business?
  • The area of the restriction. This wholly depends on the business. It is possible to have a global restriction in some industries, however, in others such as hairdressing, the restriction may only be valid if they work within a few streets of your location. Even a 1 mile radius could be unreasonable if that means they cannot work in the same city, without good reason.
  • The work which is restricted. What aspect of their work that you want them to not be able to do is an issue which needs to be considered. A business needs to consider what the actual competing roles are that they want to restrict, and include these specifics in the clause. To ban an employee working for another business in ‘any capacity’ will almost always be unenforceable as too wide and vague.
  • Competitors which you wish to be included. To take the hairdressing example, state the specific local competitors that you do not wish a former employee to work at for a period of time. Not all hairdressers in the area, just direct competitors. If the clause names those specific 3 or 4 firms, then it is more likely to be an enforceable term or clause than if you state any hairdressers within the town.
Consideration must be given as to whether or not the clause is really necessary, or whether there is an element of paranoia or ‘safety first’ in creating the clauses. Too often these clauses are so wide, vague and all-encompassing that they could not hope to be enforceable because not enough thought has been given to them and they lack specific detail to justify each clause. In any event, quite often companies want more of a ‘bark’ of warning and deterrent rather than for the clause to have any real bite which is enforceable. The truth of the matter is that in order to enforce any clause, a business needs to be prepared to issue court proceedings against an individual in the County / High Court, which can be very costly, time-consuming and complex. Quite often, the cost of enforcing a restrictive covenant can be a restriction itself. Speak to our trusted legal team today for HR advice about the issues surrounding restrictive covenants.
About the Author
Victoria Owings
Victoria Owings
Victoria Owings, Author at Wirehouse Employer Services

Prior to joining Wirehouse Employer Services in June 2017 Victoria worked as a consultant for another health and safety consultancy company for over 10 years. Victoria has experience of working in a wide range of different industries including engineering, manufacturing, hospitality, construction, care sector, funeral homes, veterinary practices, dental & doctors surgeries, golf clubs, transport and distribution, pharmaceutical and office environments. She has extensive knowledge with ISO 18001: 45001: Level 5 Achilles Building Confidence. RISQS, SafeContractor, Construction Line, SMAS, CHAS, Exor, Build UK, Altius VA CDM Comply, Eurosafe CDM Competent, Acclaim, Avetta, CQC and FORs.

More from the site

Employment Law Changes 2024

Employment Law Changes 2024

Apprentice Contracts versus Apprentice Agreements

Apprentice Contracts versus Apprentice Agreements

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

Flexible Working Request | The 2023 Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill Update to Legislation.

Flexible Working Request | The 2023 Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill Update to Legislation.

Fire and Rehire – Draft Code April 2023 Your Essential HR Guide

Fire and Rehire – Draft Code April 2023 Your Essential HR Guide

Statutory Minimum Notice Period & Dismissing an Employee

Statutory Minimum Notice Period & Dismissing an Employee